Systems Analysts in Chaordic Organizations
نویسنده
چکیده
The aim of this paper is to identify who is a systems analyst in organizations in a turbulent world. We see a need to radically rethink the way in which information systems are developed. There have appeared some efforts to create systems analysis methods for business professionals, for example, Alter (2002) and Bednar (2000). To promote the development of such methods, there is a need to theoretically validate the need for the development. From literature review, we derive a hypothesis that ‘analysis by external agents’ has been at the heart of the practice in organizations. In organizations that fit with the hypothesis, agency costs occur in the form of IS failures because business professionals could not forecast their future of business and are subject to bounded rationality not sufficient to control the agents. Having encountered complexity theory and the turbulent economy of globalism, some practitioners and researchers have recognized the increasing importance of creativity and sustainability of organizations, and started to use a term “chaordic organization” to describe a new type of organizations in contrast to the rationalistic one assumed in the dominant management discourse. We will show the inappropriateness of the hypothesis by revealing the built-in causality in the light of theoretical arguments made by Stacey et al (2000). They derived Transformative Teleology from the review of philosophical thinking, the purpose of which is the continuity and transformation of identity and difference. In chaordic organizations under Transformative Teleology, the future is unpredictable and under perpetual construction. This focuses attention on conversation as the central activity of organizing. This is inconsistent with the notion of ‘analysis by external agents.’ In a chaordic organization, its members create social realities under perpetual construction. Therefore, it is theoretically suggested that systems analysis becomes one of their ongoing activities. New systems analysis methods are required as the tools for sensemaking of their own practice and for interaction between the members. The methods are different from the conventional ones for IT professionals.
منابع مشابه
Chaordic Systems Thinking as a Basin for Organisational Novelty
Chaordic Systems Thinking (CST) is a framework that uses chaos as a lens and as a metaphor for change. CST is developed as a successor of Open Systems Thinking (OST) [5] [6]. Its basic terms and concepts are described below. Complexity is defined neither as a theory, nor as a lens, but rather as one – among many – characteristics of whole systems [3]. We take this position as point of departure...
متن کاملTools for Learning and Knowledge Creation in Collaborative Networked Organizations
This conceptual paper considers in some detail Nonaka’s Dynamic Theory of Knowledge Creation. Especially the concept of Ba or Basho is explored with the explicit goal to figure out its potential applicability as a tool for the enhancement of learning in Collaborative Networked Organisations (CNOs). To that end, its firm grounding in East-Asian thinking is further analysed, and some similarities...
متن کاملChaordic Systems Thinking Chaos and Complexity to Explain Human Performance Management
This conceptual contribution is about a new framework for explaining human performance management under turbulent conditions, which was based on the Chaos lens. The following general concepts are described: Discontinuous growth curve, attractors and their basins, holons and holonic development, dialogue, sustainable work systems, organisational novelty, the chaordic properties of consciousness,...
متن کاملPerceived Importance of Systems Analysts' Job Skills, Roles, and Non-Salary Incentives
System analysts are service providers who are required to work closely with users for the purpose of defining, developing and implementing computer-based systems. Analysts and users in pdvate organizations may have different expectations and proficiencies than those in public organizations, in part due to the types of appli. cations required. Beliefs about how others are supposed to perform and...
متن کاملPlanning Cooperation in Inter-Organizational Systems
More and more organizations cooperate in networks to perform increasingly complex tasks. Rather than managing their resources in isolation, organizations construct inter-organizational networks in which flows of information support joint value-creating processes. Organizations participating in such networks need to understand how closer cooperation with selected members of that network can be f...
متن کامل